On 12/5/07, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As I said, maybe i'll look at git in another year or so. > But i'm certainly going to ignore all the "git is so great, we should > move gcc to it" people until it works better, while i am much more > inclined to believe the "hg is so great, we should move gc to it" > people.
Just out of curiosity, is there something wrong with the current choice of svn? As I recall, it wasn't too long ago that gcc converted from cvs to svn. What's the motivation to change again? (I'm not trying to oppose anything.. I'm just curious, as I don't know much about this kind of thing).
