On 12/6/07, Andrey Belevantsev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > It's surprising that you don't mention svk, which is based on top > > of Subversion[*]. Has anyone tried? Is there any problem with it? > I must agree with Ismail's reply here. We have used svk for our > internal development for about two years, for the reason of easy > mirroring of gcc trunk and branching from it locally. I would not > complain about its speed, but sometimes we had problems with merge from > trunk, ending up with e.g. zero-sized files in our branch which were > removed from trunk, or we even couldn't merge at all, and I had to > resort to underlying subversion repository for merging. As a result, > we're currently migrating to mercurial.
I would not recommend SVK either (even being an SVN committer). While i love the SVK guys to death, it's just not the way to go if you want a distributed system. > > Andrey >
