On 16 January 2008 22:09, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On 1/16/08 4:16 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>
>> Because it's not a bug? You're changing the code to silence a false
>> negative, which this is what we here in England call "putting the cart
>> before the horse." If we clean up all the memory regions on closedown
>> we'll be wasting CPU time. And for what?
>
> I agree. Freeing memory right before we exit is a waste of time.
So, no gcc without an MMU and virtual memory platform ever again? Shame, it
used to run on Amigas.
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
