On 22 January 2008 14:06, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: > I agree that weighing the user base doesn't make any practical sense. > But I can't understand the reason for removing something that works > fine because it may rot in the future.
It's particularly with the lack of test results that that situation becomes a problem. It's not about "removing something that works fine because it may rot in the future" _as such_; it's about removing something that we don't even know if it works or not, because in the absence of test results we will not notice when that hypothetical future-when-it-doesn't-work becomes "now". > I understand that if you don't > get test results then you may assume there are no users. No, I don't think we can assume that; I think we can only infer that, if we see no testresults, there are no /developers/. > But if you get test results and they are fairly clean? Well, we'll cross that bridge *if* we come to it, but, as Joseph points out, there haven't been any test results in over a year. cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today....