On 22 January 2008 14:06, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> I agree that weighing the user base doesn't make any practical sense.
> But I can't understand the reason for removing something that works
> fine because it may rot in the future.
It's particularly with the lack of test results that that situation becomes
a problem. It's not about "removing something that works fine because it may
rot in the future" _as such_; it's about removing something that we don't even
know if it works or not, because in the absence of test results we will not
notice when that hypothetical future-when-it-doesn't-work becomes "now".
> I understand that if you don't
> get test results then you may assume there are no users.
No, I don't think we can assume that; I think we can only infer that, if we
see no testresults, there are no /developers/.
> But if you get test results and they are fairly clean?
Well, we'll cross that bridge *if* we come to it, but, as Joseph points out,
there haven't been any test results in over a year.
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
