On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Daniel Berlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > No, nothing is wrong wit he import, if you want all the remote > > branches, you have to ask git to get all the remote branches > > > > git config --add remote.origin.fetch '+refs/remotes/*:refs/remotes/*' > > This will put the remote branch heads in refs/remotes, you might want to > put them in refs/remotes/origin instead. > > $ git config --add remote.origin.fetch > '+refs/remotes/*:refs/remotes/origin/*' > > > > Then fetch again. > > then, if you want to really see all the branches, including the remote > > ones, use git branch -a -l, not -r -l. > > git branch -r should already show all remote branches (ie. every ref > under refs/remotes), git branch -a shows you all local branches in > addition. (And -l has no meaning unless you create a branch.)
I hope this helps everyone understand why i have no desire to maintain the git setup :) Git is a foreign language to me, and one I am not particularly interested in becoming fluent in. I am happy to simply be able to ask the locals where the bathroom is.
