Mark Mitchell wrote on 25 July 2008 17:30: > Steven Bosscher wrote: > >> If this pass is effectively unmaintained, why not just remove it? >> Unmaintained passes that are not enabled at any optimization level are >> usually broken anyway. > > That's an option, too; the question is whether it has any value. I > don't know.
Seems a bit of a shame though; it was only just contributed fairly recently, wasn't it? cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today....