Paolo Carlini wrote:
Paolo Carlini wrote:
Sebastian Redl wrote:
Could we simply export __exchange_and_add and __atomic_add from
libsupc++ instead of libstdc++? They are pretty basic building
blocks in my opinion.
I agree, in principle.
Well, thinking more about it, I don't see how you can do it without
breaking the binary compatibility...
Paolo.
What part, exactly? libstdc++.so still exports the symbol, since the
supc++ and stdc++ libraries are both in there. libsupc++.a will export
it and libstdc++.a won't, but do ABI considerations apply to static
libraries?
Sebastian
