On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 1:24 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Diego Novillo <dnovi...@google.com> wrote: >> The LTO branch is starting to get some semblance of stability, though >> is by no means in any kind of mergeable state. I have updated the >> wiki page to reflect the current status (Simon, Rafael, Doug, Cary, >> please make sure I haven't missed anything substantial): >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/LinkTimeOptimization >> >> Essentially, the biggest areas where we need help are: >> >> - Testing on other targets. We have only tested on x86 (32 and 64 >> bit) targets. I'm pretty sure other targets are either non-functional >> or show major breakage. We'd appreciate any daily tester that could >> include the branch and report bugs to bugzilla (feel free to assign to >> me). >> > > I can try to run tests on Linux/ia32, Linux/ia64 and Linux/x86-64. Does it > require gold? It will be nice if gold can be installed along with ld and > gcc can check/pick the appropriate linker.
On Linux/ia32, my result with revision 143742 is different from http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-01/msg02939.html I have extra failures and extra passes: -- New failures: FAIL: 21_strings/basic_string/numeric_conversions/char/stod.cc execution test FAIL: 21_strings/basic_string/numeric_conversions/char/stof.cc execution test FAIL: 21_strings/basic_string/numeric_conversions/char/stold.cc execution test FAIL: 22_locale/locale/cons/12352.cc execution test FAIL: 23_containers/vector/bool/modifiers/insert/31370.cc execution test FAIL: 25_algorithms/heap/moveable.cc execution test FAIL: 25_algorithms/next_permutation/1.cc execution test FAIL: 25_algorithms/nth_element/1.cc execution test FAIL: 25_algorithms/partial_sort/1.cc execution test FAIL: 25_algorithms/partial_sort/moveable.cc execution test FAIL: 25_algorithms/prev_permutation/1.cc execution test FAIL: 27_io/basic_filebuf/overflow/char/13858.cc execution test FAIL: 27_io/basic_filebuf/overflow/wchar_t/13858.cc execution test FAIL: 27_io/basic_filebuf/sync/char/9182-1.cc execution test FAIL: 27_io/basic_ios/exceptions/char/2.cc execution test FAIL: ext/pb_ds/regression/hash_data_map_rand.cc execution test FAIL: ext/pb_ds/regression/hash_no_data_map_rand.cc execution test FAIL: ext/pb_ds/regression/priority_queue_rand.cc execution test FAIL: ext/pb_ds/regression/tree_data_map_rand.cc execution test FAIL: ext/pb_ds/regression/tree_no_data_map_rand.cc execution test FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/tailrecursion-5.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "\mfac\M" 4 FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/tailrecursion-5.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "\mfib\M" 5 FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/tailrecursion-5.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "\mpow2m1\M" 4 FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/tailrecursion-5.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "\msq_sum\M" 4 FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/tailrecursion-5.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "\msum\M" 4 FAIL: tr1/2_general_utilities/enable_shared_from_this/not_shared2.cc execution test FAIL: tr1/2_general_utilities/enable_shared_from_this/not_shared3.cc execution test FAIL: tr1/2_general_utilities/enable_shared_from_this/not_shared.cc execution test FAIL: tr1/3_function_objects/function/2.cc execution test FAIL: tr1/3_function_objects/function/3.cc execution test FAIL: tr1/3_function_objects/function/9.cc execution test New passes: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/tailrecursion-5.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "\\mfac\\M" 4 FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/tailrecursion-5.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "\\mfib\\M" 5 FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/tailrecursion-5.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "\\mpow2m1\\M" 4 FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/tailrecursion-5.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "\\msq_sum\\M" 4 FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/tailrecursion-5.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "\\msum\\M" 4 H.J.
