On Sat, 21 Feb 2009, Steven Bosscher wrote: > Hi, > > No changes were checked in on the autovect-branch in the last ~15 > months, but the branch still gets a daily bump on DATESTAMP.
When I moved a lot of branches to the list of inactive branches in svn.html last July <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-07/msg01456.html> I didn't move autovect-branch because it had seen at least one commit (other than the DATESTAMP updates) within the previous year. This fits with your observation of no changes in 15 months, and by my definition it would indeed now be an inactive branch. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
