On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Joseph S. Myers <jos...@codesourcery.com> wrote: > On Sat, 21 Feb 2009, Steven Bosscher wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> No changes were checked in on the autovect-branch in the last ~15 >> months, but the branch still gets a daily bump on DATESTAMP. > > When I moved a lot of branches to the list of inactive branches in > svn.html last July > <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-07/msg01456.html> I didn't move > autovect-branch because it had seen at least one commit (other than the > DATESTAMP updates) within the previous year. This fits with your > observation of no changes in 15 months, and by my definition it would > indeed now be an inactive branch.
Apart from that, we shouldn't do DATESTAMP updates on random branches. Richard.
