On Sun, 15 Mar 2009, Dominique Dhumieres wrote: > I think a change in the licence is against the gcc policy for stage 4: > it is neither a regression (no pr open stating it) nor a documentation > fix.
Note that documentation changes don't need to be fixes in any GCC stage. (The license is closer to documentation than to code in the context of stages and the risk of changes causing regressions.) Gerald
