2009/4/1 Andrew Haley <a...@redhat.com>: > Kirill Kononenko wrote: >>>> 2009/4/1 Andrew Haley <a...@redhat.com>: >>>>> Kirill Kononenko wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I would like to ask your opinion about possibility for integration of >>>>>> the libJIT Just-In-Time compilation library and GCC. For example, the >>>>>> same way as libffi is integrated within gcc source tree. It seems to >>>>>> me that LLVM solves many goals that are already complete and solved in >>>>>> GCC. So I think libJIT potentially is more useful for GCC and software >>>>>> developers. >>>>> Useful for what? I think you have to tell us how this will improve the >>>>> experience of gcc users . >>> Kirill Kononenko wrote: >>>> More useful in implementation of Just-In-Time compilation in Virtual >>>> Machine runtimes. For example, for Microsoft Common Intermediate >>>> Language (.NET). >>> We already know what a JIT does, thank you. I think you have to tell us how >> >> Please could you specify more precisely the 'we' here? > > Everybody who reads the gcc list knows what a JIT does. > >> I really don't understand what you exactly mean here. >> >>> having libjit integrated in gcc will improve the experience of gcc users. >>> As opposed to them, say, using libjit as a library separate from gcc. >> >> Just read my first post. > > I have, and you gave no reasons why this might help anyone. > I'm beginning to think this is an April Fool "joke".
Please let me know who are the 'we' in your previous post? I' m beginning to think that you have a personal interest here. I think you either meant there "I" or your company in which you work full-time, and get your paycheck. I am correct to suppose this? I am beginning to think that this is an April Fool "joke" of your part. Thanks, Kirill