Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Perhaps libiberty should be a shared library, not a static one, linked from
> cc1, when GCC has plugin enabled.
> We might also artificially add a reference to each libiberty function from
> cc1.
Or link it into cc1 et al. using "--whole-archive".
> If we did link dynamically libiberty.so:
We would also have to install it, and start worrying about library API
versioning and backward compatibility, or at any rate I think that's the main
reason why this has not been done in the pasy (cf. libbfd).
cheers,
DaveK
