On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis <dosr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> other than having been merged into trunk (for example, it may have been >>> replaced by another branch without all changes being merged into trunk). >> >> My inclination would be to delete branches like that as well. > > that sounds a sensible thing to do.
Can you still see deleted branches when you list svn/gcc/branches? If not we should somewhere note down the last undeleted revision of a branch, otherwise you'd have to random guess revisions for checking them out, no? Richard.
