On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 10/12/2009 10:22 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> >> Yep. Anyone deleting dead branches should add a link to the last "live" >> version in branches.html. It seems easier to me to move them under >> branches/dead, and possibly create branches/merged. > > Multiple directory levels under branches/ confuse git-svn; it thinks "dead" > is a single branch. I'd rather not expand on that usage.
That seems like a huge bug in git-svn because we already use multiple directory levels under branches. Hint ibm and redhat and debain. Thanks, Andrew Pinski