On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, Richard Guenther wrote:

> The summary is as follows, extra errors compared to a run
> without the merge patch applied:
> 
> i586:
> 
> FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-warn-unused-result.c (internal compiler error)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-warn-unused-result.c (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/visibility-7.c  (test for warnings, line 8)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/visibility-7.c (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/i386-pf-3dnow-1.c scan-assembler prefetch
> FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/i386-pf-3dnow-1.c scan-assembler prefetchw
> FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/i386-pf-athlon-1.c scan-assembler prefetchnta
> FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/i386-pf-athlon-1.c scan-assembler prefetcht
> FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/i386-pf-athlon-1.c scan-assembler prefetchw
> FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/i386-pf-sse-1.c scan-assembler prefetchnta
> FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/i386-pf-sse-1.c scan-assembler prefetcht0
> FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/i386-pf-sse-1.c scan-assembler prefetcht1
> FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/i386-pf-sse-1.c scan-assembler prefetcht2
> FAIL: 26_numerics/headers/cmath/fabs_inline.cc (test for excess errors)

These are non-LTO tests without any LTO options being used, i.e. 
regressions introduced by the merge.  They will therefore need fixing 
before the merge can be committed to trunk.  (The 
attr-warn-unused-result.c and visibility-7.c ones appear on mutliple 
targets in this list.)

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com

Reply via email to