On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Joseph S. Myers <jos...@codesourcery.com> wrote: > On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, Richard Guenther wrote: > >> The summary is as follows, extra errors compared to a run >> without the merge patch applied: >> >> i586: >> >> FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-warn-unused-result.c (internal compiler error) >> FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-warn-unused-result.c (test for excess errors) >> FAIL: gcc.dg/visibility-7.c (test for warnings, line 8) >> FAIL: gcc.dg/visibility-7.c (test for excess errors) >> FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/i386-pf-3dnow-1.c scan-assembler prefetch >> FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/i386-pf-3dnow-1.c scan-assembler prefetchw >> FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/i386-pf-athlon-1.c scan-assembler prefetchnta >> FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/i386-pf-athlon-1.c scan-assembler prefetcht >> FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/i386-pf-athlon-1.c scan-assembler prefetchw >> FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/i386-pf-sse-1.c scan-assembler prefetchnta >> FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/i386-pf-sse-1.c scan-assembler prefetcht0 >> FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/i386-pf-sse-1.c scan-assembler prefetcht1 >> FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/i386-pf-sse-1.c scan-assembler prefetcht2 >> FAIL: 26_numerics/headers/cmath/fabs_inline.cc (test for excess errors) > > These are non-LTO tests without any LTO options being used, i.e. > regressions introduced by the merge. They will therefore need fixing > before the merge can be committed to trunk. (The > attr-warn-unused-result.c and visibility-7.c ones appear on mutliple > targets in this list.)
The i386-pf-* tests are somehow executing not only for the specified torture options in i386-prefetch.exp but also for "", the empty option. This causes the extra fails. This is because of the torture-options.exp changes, I have a patch. Richard. > -- > Joseph S. Myers > jos...@codesourcery.com >
