On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:10, Basile STARYNKEVITCH <bas...@starynkevitch.net> wrote:
> Then I would imagine it requires a copyright transfer to FSF different of > the one covering GCC development. The legal document covering my > contribution cites specifically GCC (not binutils). > > Getting that copyright transfer signed by my employer was so painful that I > would never go thru that again :-( :-( > > But then, I would imagine that LTO plugins only discussion should go to a > binutils or a gold list [which I don't subscribe to], not a gcc one! What are you talking about? Diego.
