On 2009-11-26 10:12:39 +1100, Ben Elliston wrote: > On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 15:17 -0500, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote: > > Finally, we have a process for reverting a patch. If anyone wants to > > revert some part, it needs to be followed. Otherwise *that* would be > > breaking the rules... > > Won't reverting the patch just attribute all of the lines to the > username of the reverter?
Probably not if this is done with "svn cp" from the previous revision (and the patch won't appear in the log anymore). But I don't know the side effects of such a "svn cp" on merges and so on. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arénaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)