2011/1/28 Basile Starynkevitch <bas...@starynkevitch.net>: >> Its intention is to mention noteworthy internal changes, i.e. changes >> interesting for, say, maintainers of backends/frontends outside the >> tree, and of course plugin developers upgrading from 4.5 to 4.6. >> > > > I am not sure to understand what is the social rules to modify that. I > suppose that any patch to that page should be approved with the same > strong process as patches to trunk code?
It needs to be reviewed, but it's much easier IMHO. > I am not sure to understand the technical ways to modify that; is CVS > still mandatory? Yes. > Perhaps we should mention the gtype.state file also. I think that mentioning gtype.state--very shortly--is a good idea. Would you like to prepare the patch with your suggested wording? -- Laurynas
