On Jan 28, 2011, at 8:04 AM, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:
> 2011/1/28 Basile Starynkevitch <bas...@starynkevitch.net>:
>>> Its intention is to mention noteworthy internal changes, i.e. changes
>>> interesting for, say, maintainers of backends/frontends outside the
>>> tree, and of course plugin developers upgrading from 4.5 to 4.6.
>>>
>>
>>
>> I am not sure to understand what is the social rules to modify that. I
>> suppose that any patch to that page should be approved with the same
>> strong process as patches to trunk code?
>
> It needs to be reviewed, but it's much easier IMHO.
I'm wondering if it would be helpful for the internal changes to be documented
in a separate file, rather than in the same file as the user changes. That
makes it more obvious what documentation is being touched.
paul
