On 04/29/2011 04:15 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> * cxx_binding should be 16 bytes, not 20.Not your fault, but comments like this on SpeedupAreas are so opaque as to be useless. *Why* should cxx_binding be 16 bytes? Should we take the next member out and have a VEC someplace instead of chaining? Are we duplicating information in the members themselves? Etc.
Sorry, you're right. It's about cache lines I guess, and moving the bitfields into one of the pointers.
Paolo
