On 28 December 2011 20:57, R A wrote: > > templates, i have no problem with, i wish there could be a C dialect that can > integrate it, so i wouldn't have to be forced to use C++ and all the bloat > that usually come from a lot of it's implementation (by that i mean a > performance close to C i think is very possible for C++'s library).
What "bloat"? If you only use the subset of C++ that is compatible with C++ then you don't get any additional cost, you are not "forced" to use anything, or to get any mythical "bloat" > but, of course, one has to ask "if you're making your code portable to any C > compiler, why do you want gcc to change (or modify it for your own use)? you > should be persuading the c committee." > well, that's the thing, it's harder to do the latter, so by doing this, i can > demonstrate that it's a SIMPLE, but good idea. It's not simple, or IMHO a good idea.
