>> I agree that such conversion will have to be done at some point, but >> I'm not sure if a big rewrite should happen way before the rest of the >> code will start to use gengtype-annotated C++ data structures. > > Wait, I don't follow. Â gengtype supporting C++ data structures is > different than writing gengtype in C++.
Unless I misunderstood it, Basile's stated reason for the C++ rewrite is to implement C++ data structure support at the same time? -- Laurynas
