> On 29/03/2012, at 5:38 PM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > > > I volunteer as the reviewer for Android sub-port. > > > > Android/Bionic support is an extension over Linux port and is being > > gradually added for more and more architectures. I wrote the original > > Android GCC support for ARM (under a watchful design eye of Joseph Myers), > > and know how the bits fit together. > > > > As adding Android support to a new architecture requires changes to that > > architecture, the architecture maintainer will have the power of veto for > > the Android-related changes. > > One of the members of SC raised a good point about whether architecture > maintainers would prefer to handle the Android patches themselves. My > intention is to spare you the additional headache of dealing with Android, > but, well, maybe you like it :-). > > Richard E., > Jan, > Richard S., > > Do you want to handle Android changes by yourself or do you want to delegate?
I am happy with the idea of having Android manintainer. The configure bits are kind of independent of the actual architecture support anyway. Honza > > Thank you, > > -- > Maxim Kuvyrkov > CodeSourcery / Mentor Graphics > > >
