Maxim Kuvyrkov <ma...@codesourcery.com> writes: > On 29/03/2012, at 5:38 PM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > >> I volunteer as the reviewer for Android sub-port. >> >> Android/Bionic support is an extension over Linux port and is being >> gradually added for more and more architectures. I wrote the original >> Android GCC support for ARM (under a watchful design eye of Joseph Myers), >> and know how the bits fit together. >> >> As adding Android support to a new architecture requires changes to that >> architecture, the architecture maintainer will have the power of veto for >> the Android-related changes. > > One of the members of SC raised a good point about whether architecture > maintainers would prefer to handle the Android patches themselves. My > intention is to spare you the additional headache of dealing with Android, > but, well, maybe you like it :-). > > Richard E., > Jan, > Richard S., > > Do you want to handle Android changes by yourself or do you want to delegate?
Having a separate maintainer of MIPS Android sounds good to me too (and thanks for asking). As Richard E says, we should probably coordinate any changes to the generic MIPS files, but I wouldn't know what's right for Android-specific stuff. Richard
