On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:17 AM, Basile Starynkevitch <bas...@starynkevitch.net> wrote:
>> You appear to be moving in directions that may give pause to >> those who championed better separation of concerns in GCC. > > > I am not sure to understand that last sentence (I had to read it 4 times, > with different ways of understanding it). But I certainly don't understand > why you feel that my wish of having a collection of named and identified > modules in GCC is not a way of wanting seperation of concerns in GCC. Where do you take that feeling from? -- Gaby