On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis <g...@integrable-solutions.net> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:17 AM, Basile Starynkevitch > <bas...@starynkevitch.net> wrote: > >>> You appear to be moving in directions that may give pause to >>> those who championed better separation of concerns in GCC. >> >> >> I am not sure to understand that last sentence (I had to read it 4 times, >> with different ways of understanding it). But I certainly don't understand >> why you feel that my wish of having a collection of named and identified >> modules in GCC is not a way of wanting seperation of concerns in GCC. > > Where do you take that feeling from?
And what does this all have to do with always enabling plugins or not? Richard. > -- Gaby
