Hi, On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:12:17PM -0800, Andrew Pinski wrote: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Diego Novillo <dnovi...@google.com> wrote: > > In this day and age of rich-text capable mailers, restricting postings > > to be text-only seems quaint and antiquated. Are there any hard > > requirements that force us to only accept plain text messages? > > I think it is a bad idea to accept non plain text messages (except for > attachments). >
Just for the record, I'm also against rich text reaching gcc mailing lists. I use mutt for work email and consider such messages irritating in one or (usually) more ways whenever I get them. Martin
