Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com> a écrit:
> A return statement with no operand is always wrong, but -Wreturn-type
> also warns about this, which is valid:
>
> int f(int c)
> {
> if (c)
> return 0;
> function_that_never_returns();
> }
>
[...]
> So maybe it makes sense to split -Wreturn-type to separately handle
> "return with no value in function returning non-void" and "control
> reaches end of non-void function".
That would make sense, yes.
--
Dodji
