Hello,

On 17/11/2013 17:47, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 17 November 2013 15:40, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>> For "control reaches end of non-void function", I haven't activated by
>> default and I called the option -Wfalloff-nonvoid-function
>> Of course, that is just a proposal! :) Better names are welcome.
> It was nearly called -Wmissing-return a decade ago, but got bundled
> with -Wreturn-type, see
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-02/msg02002.html
As discussed on this mailing list, I proposed a patch on the gcc-patches
mailing list.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg00820.html

Any chance one of you could review it?

Thanks,
Sylvestre

Reply via email to