On 16 January 2014 11:11, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Hello, > > On 17/11/2013 17:47, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> On 17 November 2013 15:40, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >>> For "control reaches end of non-void function", I haven't activated by >>> default and I called the option -Wfalloff-nonvoid-function >>> Of course, that is just a proposal! :) Better names are welcome. >> It was nearly called -Wmissing-return a decade ago, but got bundled >> with -Wreturn-type, see >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-02/msg02002.html > As discussed on this mailing list, I proposed a patch on the gcc-patches > mailing list. > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg00820.html > > Any chance one of you could review it?
I like the change in principle, but it's not up to me, I can't approve front-end patches. I can comment on the docs and ChangeLog but I'm not subscribed to gcc-patches so didn't get the mail. I'll send some comments, could you please reply to your gcc-patches mail and include my comments? Thanks.
