On Tue, 2013-11-26 06:33:39 -0600, Joel Sherrill <joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com> wrote: > Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbg...@lug-owl.de> wrote: > > Build logs at > > http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=39192 > > http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=40718 > > > > (I also think that we'd have the little endian version on the > > target list at contrib/config-list.mk ...) > > > > > > g++ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -fno-exceptions > > -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing > > -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attribute -pedantic > > -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -Werror > > -fno-common -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../gcc/gcc > > -I../../../gcc/gcc/. -I../../../gcc/gcc/../include > > -I../../../gcc/gcc/../libcpp/include -I/opt/cfarm/mpc/include > > -I../../../gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber -I../../../gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd > > -I../libdecnumber -I../../../gcc/gcc/../libbacktrace -o reload1.o -MT > > reload1.o -MMD -MP -MF ./.deps/reload1.TPo ../../../gcc/gcc/reload1.c > > ../../../gcc/gcc/reload1.c: In function ‘void > > elimination_costs_in_insn(rtx)’: > > ../../../gcc/gcc/reload1.c:3750:41: error: ‘orig_dup[0]’ may be used > > uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] > > *recog_data.dup_loc[i] = orig_dup[i]; > > ^ > > cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors > > make[2]: *** [reload1.o] Error 1 > > > Was microblaze-rtems attempted? I would have expected a failure like > these if so.
No, it wasn't. It's not on the list of targets in
.../gcc/contrib/config-list.mk . So we'd probably add that to the
target list I guess? I'll propose a patch later tonight (adding to
another pending patch to config-list.mk)
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de +49-172-7608481
Signature of: ...und wenn Du denkst, es geht nicht mehr,
the second : kommt irgendwo ein Lichtlein her.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
