On 11/26/2013 11:58 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 11/26/2013 06:38 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > >>> Is there something that microblaze-rtems exposes that is not already >>> covered by other microblaze or rtems targets that are already included? >> >> I believe it was on the microblaze where someone broke the >> libgcc pattern for rtems by changing the pattern from >> XXX*-*-* to XXX*-*-elf. > Correct. microblaze-rtems* is incomplete in libgcc. > > I have a patch pending for gcc-4.8.x, but haven't yet tried with > gcc-4.9.x.
It should be the same patch. I wrote one too and obviously forgot to upstream it. For those who care, this is the seemingly benign patch which broke it. http://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=98f2ac05e3adaf283a55531a3e274e20aad6048d The lesson is that every target has to take a path through those large switches. And things can and do break. > Ralf > > -- Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com On-Line Applications Research Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805 Support Available (256) 722-9985
