On 27 March 2014 10:12, Andreas Schwab <sch...@suse.de> wrote: > Can't you use __builtin_frame_address (0) instead?
That would give me the frame pointer, not the stack pointer, and the user would have to calculate manually the offset to get the actual stack pointer, which would be target-specific, possibly making it even worse. Is that what you meant? cheers, --renato
