On 11/17/14 03:06, Richard Biener wrote:
Also, presumably if this were merged, it would require a followup with the gimple to gimple * fixup you wanted? (which we talked about doing as an early stage3 thing IIRC [1]).Yeah, that would be nice (to remind people - this is about getting rid of const_gimple and thus avoids introducing tons of new const_ for all the subclasses).
Right. Mirrors what we've done for INSNs in RTL as well. jeff
