On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:20:46PM +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 06:14:30PM -0500, David Kunsman wrote: > >> Hello, I was just reading through the current projects wiki page and I > >> noticed how out of date pretty much all of them are. So I was > >> planning on doing "spring cleaning" by going down the list tracking > >> down what has been and what needs to be down and updating all the > >> wikis. Do you think this is something that is worthwhile to work on? > > Yes, I think that would be very useful. > > On 24 March 2015 at 12:16, Martin Jambor wrote: > > Yes, I think that even just moving hopelessly outdated stuff to some > > "Archive" section, > > I don't see any need to move pages (that would break old links).
You're right, by section I meant the page sections where links to outdated contents are. I do not know why I thought for a moment that changing the URL would happen too. > Just add a header to old pages saying they are outdated, and stop > linking to them from other pages that imply they are current. There > could be a single ArchivedProjects page, or just sub-section of > another page, that links to the old projects, but no need to move the > old project pages themselves. This is exactly what I actually had in mind. Martin
