On Fri, 22 May 2015, Richard Biener wrote: > All arguments still apply apart from the fact that we'll have plenty > of releases from the GCC 5 branch (and the alternatives patch is > safe there). > > So for GCC 5 I'm willing to leave it to the architecture maintainers, > but please wait for other RMs to chime in.
Leaving to architecture maintainers is OK with me for GCC 5. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
