> On Nov 20, 2015, at 1:24 PM, Jeff Law <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 11/20/2015 06:05 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>
>> ...
>> It seems to me that it would be better to remove the feature, forcing
>> what must be an extremely small number of users to audit and update to
>> extended asm.
> That might be a little drastic. Though if we want to go this direction, the
> first step is to deprecate for a major release cycle. It would be
> interesting to see how much stuff would complain/break.
I would expect: a lot. I've seen plenty of people writing asm statements (in
small quantities, admittedly) who have never heard of extended asm.
paul
