On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Christopher Di Bella <cjdb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I'm currently waiting on approval from my employer before I move ahead > with anything > > My employer has given me the okay to contribute to gcc, provided that I > follow some fairly straightforward rules. Most of these things are given, > such as "don't contribute to gcc while at work", "don't put work code in your > contributions or vice versa", etc. Of course, my company needs to make it > clear that I understand these rules before I'm given a green light. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Note also that if you want to learn the process, small patches do not need > any legal papers > > I'm going to start with a few minor patches, which I refrained from until I > they gave approval, and then move up in the world. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> You can coordinate with me about front end changes. > > I am hoping you mean compiler front-end (i.e. syntax, semantic, static > analysis, etc.), rather than application front-end (flags, etc.), as > the compiler front-end is the section I'm most interested in contributing to.
Yes, that's right. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To incorporate the checks into GCC would probably involve changes to ... > the C++ library > > I'm also happy to contribute to both an improved C++ Standard Library and > stdlibc++, but don't want to spread myself too thin (I'm gearing my career for > compiler development, and thus would like to work on the front-end a little > more). Would it be better to work on this before, after, or in parallel with > the > front-end? That's really up to you. If you're most interested in the front end, starting there makes sense. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Currently yes, but it was supposed to be released as open source. >> Some of the C++ Core Guidelines checks are already implemented in > clang-tidy: > > Does this mean that in your opinion, we (mostly me) should contribute to > one of those projects instead, or are they just cool projects to watch? They might be interesting to look at, but we'd definitely like to have support for this in GCC. Jason
