On Mon, 16 Dec 2019, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Should we go with the gcc-reparent.git repo now?
I think we should go with the reposurgeon conversion, with all Richard's improvements to commit messages. gcc-reparent.git has issues of its own; at least, checking the list of branches shows some branches are missing. So both conversions can still be considered works in progress. However, we should also note that stage 3 is intended to last two months, ending with the move to git <https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2019-10/msg00143.html> <https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2019-11/msg00117.html>, and given that it didn't start at the start of November as anticipated in the originally proposed timetable, that implies corresponding updates to all the dates. By now, enough people are away until the new year that now isn't a good time for deciding things anyway. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
