the differences between Maxim and Erics final result will hopefully show the open bugs in both tools and allow fixing - i think this compare phase is needed if the result should be the best possible
Am 11.12.2019 um 16:19 schrieb Jonathan Wakely:
On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 at 15:03, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > I wouldn't bother with that. There are known defects in the version of > reposurgeon that I used to produce that which have since been fixed. It > was *never* the point of that upload to ask for correctness checks on > the conversion (I said so at the time). Instead it was intended to > demonstrate the improvements to the commit summaries that I think we can > make. My concern is that there is no conversion done using reposurgeon that *can* be used to do correctness checks.
