On 03/02/2020 18:09, Michael Matz wrote:
But suggesting that using the subject line for tagging is recommended can
lead to subjects like
[PATCH][GCC][Foo][component] Fix foo component bootstrap failure
in an e-mail directed to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org (from somewhen last year,
where Foo/foo was an architecture; I'm really not trying to single out the
author). That is, _none_ of the four tags carried any informational
content.
I partially disagree with this. Certainly there's pointless redundancy
it this example, but I'd rather have the tags with a meaningful subject
than a generic subject with no tags.
gcc-patches is a high-volume list in which most of the content is
outside my range of interest and/or understanding. If I stay on top of
it then I can read all the subject lines, at least, and probably select
a few threads to learn about something new, but if I let the list get
away from me for even a short while then it's too much to handle.
I do have filters set up to highlight subjects for which I should pay
attention and if people are in the habit of tagging subjects then that
becomes much more reliable.
Conversely, the tags help me quickly decide what not to read.
I see that some people are using a "[email tag] git tag: msg" format,
and I quite like that.
Andrew
