"Nathan Sidwell" <nat...@acm.org> > On 8/16/20 9:54 AM, Stefan Kanthak wrote: >> "Nathan Sidwell" <nat...@acm.org> wrote:
[...] >>> Have you benchmarked it? >> >> Of course! Did you? [...] > you seem very angry about being asked for data. As much as you hallucinated about CMOV or processors not speculating beyond SETNZ? > As I said, I couldn't benchmark your code, because of the incorrect assembly. As I wrote, that's your fault: every x86 and its evolution x64 know SHR EAX, CL [...] > anyway, you've made it clear you do not wish to engage in constructive > discussion. Use a mirror! > BTW, I have come up with a sequence as short as GCC's but without the > conditional branch. Sadly the margin is too small to write it. Reality surely bites! Stefan
