Dear Alexandre, As stated here, shortly after I sent my message (https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2021-March/235197.html):
> Apologies, a correction here. I should have more carefully read > it, but this paragraph: > > > My problem is Dr. Richard M. Stallman stands credibly and > > factually accused of Doxxing and GCC contributor/participant and > > knowingly manipulating the project for his own personal reasons. > > This should be "RMS explicitly sanctioned, encouraged, and > blessed the Doxxing of an individual". Apologies, he did not do the > doxxing himself; this was a fat finger on my part. Please take that > into account; the rest is accurate. Taking the correction into account, no, the accusation is not even close to false. What you've presented here is your word ("This accusation is outright false, beyond any possible doubt."), with a shortened version of what happened and no evidence, and that does not match the quoted responses from Stallman and other people who were present in both the public mailing list discussion and the internal mailing list. I was given quoted evidence of, after people being told they were NOT allowed to attack people like this and go this far and being banned by moderation, RMS taking explicit actions to UNDO that moderation and explicitly, in the internal mailing list, state (paraphrased): 'I have put a new moderator in. Have at it.' That the same individuals (who Stallman, again, explicitly and knowingly) unshackled were then banned for continuing to do things that were against the Community Guidelines and grossly inappropriate (including the Doxxing). Stallman was not born yesterday, neither were any of the moderators or contributors involved: Stallman deliberately overturned moderator decisions and that decision went poorly after he explicitly signaled to people that they should Go All Out. If you (or anyone else) have evidence to the contrary, logs, screenshots, etc. that counteract what I know and I have already received, then I would LOVE to be proven wrong and have ABSOLUTELY no problem walking back every word I said and giving Richard M. Stallman an apology and respect as well as apologizing to the mailing list for believing to be led astray. If you feel the exact words should not be shared publicly, you can e-mail me or message me privately; I have honored everyone's right to privacy, and I will continue to do so. I must be explicitly clear here that the current body of evidence gives me my current conviction. There is no planet, no galaxy, no UNIVERSE, where someone who was already banned for going **way** beyond acceptable behavior, and then brought back with their punishment undone with the *explicit go-ahead to go forward* and a *new moderator for that purpose*, would not take that as a signal to be even nastier. If you are in a Leadership position and your thought process here was "well, things will go better the second time" after doing those actions, then you absolutely do not deserve to be in a Leadership position, and you absolutely should not have stewardship over me or my contributions. Especially if this is not your first time on a mailing list and this is not your first time being a leader. All my best, JeanHeyd