On 2021-04-17 10:40, Ville Voutilainen via Gcc wrote:
On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 at 20:31, Christopher Dimech <dim...@gmx.com>
wrote:
I do not see people really intending to fork. It explains why
detractors
have gone berserk.
I appreciate your colorful exaggerations, but I should point out that
the libstdc++
maintainer has stated his intention to fork, in unambigous terms. A
helper
elf of his has stated that he will follow the fork, if it occurs. I'm
politely entertaining
the possibility that you missed that, but Mr. Wakely is not joking
when he indicates
that he wishes to do a non-FSF fork of lbistdc++.
On the helper elf front, I can concretely state that I will not (for the
foreseeable future) be assigning copyright to FSF on *new* concurrency
and parallelism related features in libstdc++ or the support libraries
for this work to the FSF.
