Eric,

I think the ambiguity might come in parsing them in place.  Should we
decide on one or the other just so a parser knows what it's looking
at?

-Ross.

On 12/11/06, Eric Hellman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> either one should work;  url encoding of the "KEV context object" is
> governed by encoding rules for URIs in general- any character MAY be
> url encoded; Very strictly speaking, the characters ":" and "/"  are
> required to be URL encoded, but in practice, leaving them unencoded
> should be harmless.
>
> I'll look at the COinS spec to see where this might be clarified
>
>
> At 5:09 PM +0000 12/11/06, jrochkind wrote:
> >Hi all.
> >
> >The ocoins.info "spec" contains an example which includes:
> >
> >&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal
> >
> >When I first saw that, I thought, gee, shouldn't that be
> >escaped/encoded somehow? If I were creating an SAP1 KEV context object,
> >I believe (I confess escaping/encoding still confuses me) would need to
> >encode this like:
> >
> >&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal
> >
> >If I'm putting an SAP1 KEV context object into my COinS, then I'd think
> >I'd leave it alone just like that---except the example makes different
> >choices about escaping.
> >
> >Nowhere in the ocoins.info "spec" is the word escape or escaping
> >mentioned, or encode/encoding in the context of this question.  So it's
> >a bit confusing what is supposed to be reccommended/required here.  All
> >we have is the example to look at.
> >
> >Can we get some clarity as to how a COinS should be encoded/escaped,
> >and maybe put it on ocoins.info?  To me, again, a COinS should probably
> >be encoded just like a SAP1 KEV, and then nobody needs to specify
> >anything else.  Or at least that should be an option that applications
> >are required to support (it's been suggested to me that Zotero may not
> >support escaped COinS).  If you aren't going to say "just like"
> >something else, then I guess ocoins.info needs to spell out how things
> >should be escaped/encoded itself.  One way or another, the current
> >vagueness and spec only by one example seems to be leading to
> >confusion?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Jonathan
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
>
> Eric Hellman, Director                            OCLC Openly
> Informatics Division
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                    2 Broad St., Suite 208
> tel 1-973-509-7800 fax 1-734-468-6216              Bloomfield, NJ 07003
> http://www.openly.com/1cate/      1 Click Access To Everything
>
> >
>
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"gcs-pcs-list" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/gcs-pcs-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to