At 9:46 PM -0500 12/11/06, Ross Singer wrote:
>On 12/11/06, Eric Hellman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>  I think it would be a grave mistake to decide on one or the other-
>>  the systems that produce COinS are less flexible in being able to
>>  alter URLEncoding behavior (typically done by a library routine) than
>>  are processing systems.
>
>Where are you basing this?  I would imagine the systems that are
>producing COinS are doing it via some 'COinS-production-library' (tm).
>  Why can this not URLencode the string?

the issue is the DETAILS of the url-encoding, i.e. which characters 
the library function choses to URLEncode. The java library we uses in 
1Cate encodes "/" and ";"  whereas the library that encodes urls in 
firefox appears not to.


>  >
>>  If your COinS processing system gets tripped up by the unimportant
>>  details of the URLEncoding, I would say your system could use fixing.
>
>Eh?  What does this mean?  It's a /lot/ more expensive to figure out
>if a string is URLencoded and do (or undo or not do) something about
>it then to know beforehand that it's URLencoded or not.  What is the
>benefit to ambiguity?  Why bother with this?  To explicitly state in
>the spec whether or not it should be URLencoded or not would alleviate
>a hell of a lot of unnecessary frustration.

there's no expense- you need to urldecode values anyway if you want 
to do anything with them.
Yes, the values should be url encoded!


-- 

Eric Hellman, Director                            OCLC Openly 
Informatics Division
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                    2 Broad St., Suite 208
tel 1-973-509-7800 fax 1-734-468-6216              Bloomfield, NJ 07003
http://www.openly.com/1cate/      1 Click Access To Everything

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"gcs-pcs-list" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/gcs-pcs-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to