On 04/10/2010 12:45, Vincent Schut wrote:
On 10/01/2010 03:20 PM, Hermann Peifer wrote:
On 01/10/2010 07:03, Jukka Rahkonen wrote:
Hermann Peifer<peifer<at> gmx.eu> writes:
At work, we are taking this "standard grid" issue pretty serious, but
indeed, we might be the only ones worldwide with such a business rule.
You are not alone, we are reprojecting our rasters to standard grid
because it
helps in making seamless mosaics from the reprojected images. We are
widening
the target extents a little bit to all directions with a python
script to suit
the grid.
So we are already 2 ;-)
Actually, I tentatively thought there would be more. This was why I
wrote to the mailing list in the first place. I am aware that this
(non-)issue can be solved in a shell one-liner or perhaps X lines of
some other script code. I just thought that if there is a general
interest, it could perhaps be built into the library.
Make that 3 :-)
We also often do this, when different datasets (from several satellite
sensors) need to be used together. Cause I do almost all my gdal stuff
in python, I just coded this grid matching into the relevant python
scripts. However, if support for it would be built into the gdal command
line utilities, we would undoubtly use it often.
Thanks for the time, Vincent.
Even,
I guess that 3 interested GDAL users (on a global scale) are not enough
to make you reconsider your initial statement:
> This is a bit too specialized requirement...
?
Hermann
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
