Frank, > My brief thoughts are: > > * My objectives for GDAL/OGR 2.0 primarily revolve around > restructuring OGR to be close alignment with the GDAL API. That means > moving to a unified driver model, and GDAL style creation option and > capabilities mechanisms. I want to end up with a GDALDataset that can > have vector layers as well as bands. > . . . > * I hadn't considered big changes in the utilities myself but if ever > it was to be done now would be the time.
By integrating GDAL/OGR drivers into GDALDataset, I would imagine that we are going to be able to do things like using *gdalinfo* on a shapefile, for example. That could represent some changes in command line utilities. Regards, Ivan _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev